HOME

Mini Shell 1.0
DIR:/home/dna1981/mail/.spam/new/
Current File : /home/dna1981/mail/.spam/new/1613122781.M61977P7655.dna.dna-1981.com,S=12360,W=12610
Envelope-to: b.miller@logomastersintl.com
Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:39:41 -0600
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:38:32 -0800
To: <b.miller@logomastersintl.com>
Message-ID: <126138747717004126153613411071665@v5s5z5.survisani.guru>
From: "Concealed Carry Shirt" <ConcealedCarryShirt@survisani.guru>
Content-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=Part.588.9587.1613122712"
    
 Content analysis details:   (17.9 points, 4.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: survisani.guru]
  4.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM         Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL
                             blocklist
                             [URIs: survisani.guru]
  2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                             [195.62.46.213 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
  5.0 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
  1.0 BAYES_999              BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
  0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
                             identical to background
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
                             anti-forgery methods
  2.0 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  1.7 NORDNS_LOW_CONTRAST    No rDNS + hidden text
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:    Tactical USA is Giving Away 500 FREE Concealed Carry Shirts.

------=Part.588.9587.1613122712
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

 
The worst part about concealed carrying is all the extra stuff you have to carry around...

You need a holster for your gun... A strong belt to keep your pants up... Extra pouches for your clips...

Plus you gotta bring a lockbox or more comfortable holster for bringing your gun on the road...

But what if you didn’t need any of that?

What if your undershirt DOUBLED as a CC holster?

Well, that’s exactly what the free gift I’m sending you does... It’s a t-shirt AND a double-sided CC holster... It works for almost any handgun... There’s a holster on both sides of the t-shirt...
http://www.survisani.guru/1261-134-536-47717004/b.miller/tindex9.html
Meaning it works for right-handed and left-handed shooters…or you can carry two guns at once…or you can carry your spare mags, cell phone or other accessories.

Like I said... I’m giving you a CC T-Shirt Holster for FREE...

But we’re only giving away 500, so don’t wait to grab yours if you want one.

There’s no trials and no strings attached.

Just a free gift from us to you...

So if you want a FREE T-Shirt Holster, click the link below to see more details, and confirm your free gift on the next page:

=> Review & Confirm Your Free T-Shirt Holster

Your friends,

Andrew


http://www.survisani.guru/1261-134-536-47717004/b.miller/tindex10.html






propriate explicit or implicit coordination.[190] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[191] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization [...] his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice [...] and [...] his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians [...] remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[191] Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[192] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limi

http://www.survisani.guru/1261-134-536-47717004/b.miller/tindex11.html



------=Part.588.9587.1613122712
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

<html>
<head>
<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><span style=3D"color:#FFFFFF;">
<!-- <div style=3D"position:absolute;top:-1000px;left:-1000px;height:0px;wi=
dth:0px;"><img src=3D"http://www.survisani.guru/timgETXJRTPXG/DJAQHGQTL/126=
1/1107/1665/117/47717004/img.gif" style=3D"border=3D0;" /></div> -->
<div style=3D"position:absolute;top:-1000px;left:-1000px;height:0px;width:0=
px;"><a href=3D"http://www.survisani.guru/trOWRSTAWXT/MLBAPWYYQ/1261/1107/1=
665/117/47717004/index.htm" style=3D"border=3D0;"><div></div></a></div>
</span><center>
<div style=3D"width:600px;font-family:Arial;padding:20px; text-align:left; =
border:1px solid #48A7F5; border-radius:50px 20px;">



The worst part about <b>concealed carrying</b> is all the extra stuff you h=
ave to carry around...<br /><br />
<i>
You need a holster for your gun...

A strong belt to keep your pants up...

Extra pouches for your clips...</i><br /><br />

Plus you gotta bring a lockbox or more comfortable holster for bringing you=
r gun on the road...<br /><br />

But what if you didn=E2=80=99t need any of that?<br /><br />

What if your undershirt DOUBLED as a CC holster?<br /><br />

Well, that=E2=80=99s exactly what the free gift I=E2=80=99m sending you doe=
s...

It=E2=80=99s a t-shirt AND a double-sided CC holster...

It works for almost any handgun...

<a href=3D"http://www.survisani.guru/1261-134-536-47717004/b.miller/tindex1=
.html"><b>There=E2=80=99s a holster on both sides of the t-shirt...</b></a>=
<br /><br />

Meaning it works for right-handed and left-handed shooters=E2=80=A6or you c=
an carry two guns at once=E2=80=A6or you can carry your spare mags, cell ph=
one or other accessories.<br /><br />

<b>Like I said...</b>

<a href=3D"http://www.survisani.guru/1261-134-536-47717004/b.miller/tindex2=
.html" target=3D"blank" style=3D"font-weight:bold; color:red;">I=E2=80=99m =
giving you a CC T-Shirt Holster for FREE...</a><br /><br />

But we=E2=80=99re only giving away 500, so don=E2=80=99t wait to grab yours=
 if you want one.<br /><br />

There=E2=80=99s no trials and no strings attached.<br /><br />

Just a free gift from us to you...<br /><br />

So if you want a FREE T-Shirt Holster, click the link below to see more det=
ails, and confirm your free gift on the next page:
<br /><br />
<a href=3D"http://www.survisani.guru/1261-134-536-47717004/b.miller/tindex3=
.html" target=3D"blank" style=3D"font-weight:bold; color:red;">=3D> Review =
& Confirm Your Free T-Shirt Holster</a><br /><br />

Your friends,<br /><br />


<b>Andrew</b><br />

</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />

</center>
<br />
<span style=3D"color:#FFFFFF;">
propriate explicit or implicit coordination.[190] For instance, when contri=
butors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length re=
visions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry.=
 Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biograp=
hy Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose"=
, which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[191] =
Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War h=
istorian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said tha=
t both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln'=
s life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization [...] his artful =
use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice [...] and [...] his ability to=
 convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an=
 example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenz=
weig also criticized the "waffling=E2=80=94encouraged by the NPOV policy=E2=
=80=94[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive sta=
nce in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William =
Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling"=
, which then stated: "Some historians [...] remember him as an opportunisti=
c, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldi=
er and local folk hero."[191]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles ar=
e factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable s=
tyle. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wik=
ipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been ca=
refully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from on=
e language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator a=
t each stage."[192] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted i=
n 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson U=
niversity. The study was limi
</span>

<br /><center>
<br />
<a href=3D"http://www.survisani.guru/1261-134-536-47717004/b.miller/tindex4=
.html" target=3D"blank"><img src=3D"http://www.survisani.guru/1261-134-536-=
47717004/i/img0134536387.jpg" /></a><br />
<br /></center>

</body>
</html>

------=Part.588.9587.1613122712--