HOME

Mini Shell 1.0
DIR:/home/dna1981/mail/.spam/new/
Current File : /home/dna1981/mail/.spam/new/1640188675.M588449P19543.dna.dna-1981.com,S=14543,W=14870
Envelope-to: c.wilson@smithfamilycarpets.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:57:55 -0600
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=greenstreams.us;
 b=AZ9pK8PrwR6QN84UsjAovf+jIbN52tVt/qWJzwd9hhlrh16OGSr6UcbnwunL2FfWLFZmBjqgS5Gt
   h3BUCNrs4+xNZk/BsSSR5vzJmGfzY4XIHsSu21tDl5eqtxmgIbBp4yTbTAti7AaE8NMvhfwzPqdb
   79Kwgm0QOOMWMToGVx0=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="6a9c7aae0bd6dbbd269910346f435ecb_1274b_2bbfa"
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 10:57:08 -0500
From: "HerpaGreens" <ColdSoreVirus@greenstreams.us>
Reply-To: "Cold Sore Virus" <ColdSoreVirus@greenstreams.us>
To: <c.wilson@smithfamilycarpets.com>
Message-ID: <6a3lyzw2t3rj95i7-ougpr0lqn7efqmnq-1274b-2bbfa@greenstreams.us>
    
 Content analysis details:   (25.5 points, 4.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  5.0 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
  1.0 BAYES_999              BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
  1.2 NA_DOLLARS             BODY: Talks about a million North American dollars
  1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
                 [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?23.94.82.75>]
  1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL      Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
                             blocklist
                             [URIs: greenstreams.us]
  4.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM         Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL
                             blocklist
                             [URIs: greenstreams.us]
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: greenstreams.us]
  2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                             [23.94.82.75 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
  1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL  RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL,
                             https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/
                             [23.94.82.75 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
                             identical to background
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
                             [cf: 100]
  0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
  0.8 KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ        Prevalent use of
                             .info|.us|.me|.me.uk|.biz|xyz|id|rocks|life
                              domains in spam/malware
  0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY          Huge... sums of money
  2.0 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  1.8 FSL_BULK_SIG           Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe
  0.0 NORDNS_LOW_CONTRAST    No rDNS + hidden text
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:    Herpes Virus Hiding Place Revealed! (Nobody Believed This!)

--6a9c7aae0bd6dbbd269910346f435ecb_1274b_2bbfa
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Herpes Virus Hiding Place Revealed! (Nobody Believed This!)

http://greenstreams.us/QefC_dY28kxfksgTu-6pg0TU079299l5EI1E_smUv8h73U75CA

http://greenstreams.us/r5qGpbPDtXsYGlkDBNrkpAFmqTVer1A4eT3oLlWzPoV0E9RTHg

ame clear watching Tamasha that Imtiaz may be running out of ideas. There a=
re just so many times you can romanticize self-healing and coming-of-age be=
fore it all starts to feel contrived. In the case of this film, frankly Har=
ry and Sejal come off as characters in search of a plot."=
=
 Anupama Chopra of Film Companion wrote "The problem is that Imtiaz is unab=
le to mould the larger-than-life romantic persona of Shah Rukh into his own=
 more bruised brand of romance. Twenty-two years later, Shah Rukh is still =
Raj =E2=80=93 tender, sensitive and resolutely chaste =E2=80=93 at least wi=
th the woman he loves."=
=


Box office
The film's box office gross is ?153.43 crore (US$20 million), including ?89=
4 million (US$12 million) in India and ?641 million (US$8.5 million) overse=
as.=
=
 The film under-performed at the domestic box office.=
=
 However, the film was an overseas success, grossing US$10 million overseas=
, making it the year's second highest overseas grosser, behind only Raees, =
another Shah Rukh Khan starrer.=
=


Domestic
The film collected ?152.5 million on opening day,=
=
 becoming the lowest opener for a Shah Rukh Khan film in three years.=
=
 On the second day, it collected ? 15 crores, followed by its third day's c=
ollection of ? 15.50 crores, bringing its first weekend's collection to ? 4=
5.75 crores, and making it 2017's sixth-highest first-weekend-collecting Bo=
llywood film in the domestic market.=
=


Nevertheless, the weekend box office collection of the film did not manage =
to cross ? 50 crores, and it emerged as one of the lowest openers of Shah R=
ukh Khan in recent years.=
=
=
=


Overseas
On the first day, the film collected ?50.57 lakh (US$67,000) from 27 screen=
s in Australia, ?2,083,000 (US$28,000) from 20 screens in New Zealand, ?11.=
0 million (US$150,000) from 104 screens in the United Kingdom, ?24.4 millio=
n (US$320,000) from 252 screens in the United States and ?5,826,000 (US$77,=
000) from 26 screens in Canada.=
=
 On the second day, the film collected ?1,896,000 (US$25,000) from 10 scree=
ns in Australia, ?1,601,000 (US$21,000) from 16 screens in New Zealand, ?11=
.7 million (US$160,000) from 105 screens in the UK, ?25.3 million (US$340,=
000) from 251 screens in the US and ?7,175,000 (US$95,000) from 26 screens =
in Canada.=
=
 On the first Sunday, it collected ?3,330,000 (US$44,000) from 31 screens i=
n Australia, ?1,201,000 (US$16,000) from 21 screens in New Zealand, ?7,969,=
000 (US$110,000) from 106 screens in the UK, ?15.7 million (US$210,000) fro=
m 249 screens in the US and ?4,717,000 (US$63,000) from 26 screens in Canad=
a.=
=
 On the fourth day of release, the film collected ?729,000 (US$9,700) from =
23 screens in Australia and ?378,000 (US$5,000) from 18 screens in New Zeal=
a
=0D
--6a9c7aae0bd6dbbd269910346f435ecb_1274b_2bbfa
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
=09<title>Newsletter</title>
=09<meta name=3D"viewport" content=3D"width=3Dde-vice-width, initial-scale=
=3D1.0">
</head>
<body><a href=3D"http://greenstreams.us/hWyvmUAc5xEqk5FVvCWZwDdh_dp2ML0o3Qn=
mvYsRqKwOwT9iKA"><img src=3D"http://greenstreams.us/f932b19db620540a9f.jpg"=
 /><img height=3D"1" src=3D"http://www.greenstreams.us/1LRxhVyF0lhAJvgBmeBh=
2GQLrv7ARLQRkLm9VPHeuFT6by7EEg" width=3D"1" /></a>
<center>&nbsp;
<div style=3D"width:600px; text-align:left; padding:15px; font-family:Arial=
; font-size:17px;line-height:25px; border:2px solid #878589;">Even <span st=
yle=3D"background-color:red; padding:5px; color:yellow; font-weight:bold;">=
Oxford and Cambridge</span> doctors were alarmed when they saw this...<br /=
>
<br />
As new research reveals <a href=3D"http://greenstreams.us/QefC_dY28kxfksgTu=
-6pg0TU079299l5EI1E_smUv8h73U75CA" http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" rel=3D"spo=
nsored" style=3D"color:#9900cc;font-weight:bold;" target=3D"blank">the true=
 place where the cold sore virus hides!</a><br />
<br />
And it&rsquo;s not just <b>&quot;skin deep&quot;</b>, as everybody is false=
ly led to believe...<br />
<br />
<a href=3D"http://greenstreams.us/QefC_dY28kxfksgTu-6pg0TU079299l5EI1E_smUv=
8h73U75CA" http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" rel=3D"sponsored" target=3D"blank"=
><img http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" rel=3D"sponsored" src=3D"http://greenst=
reams.us/284ffdd7afef1dff7e.png" target=3D"blank" /> </a><br />
<br />
Instead, the virus creeps <a href=3D"http://greenstreams.us/QefC_dY28kxfksg=
Tu-6pg0TU079299l5EI1E_smUv8h73U75CA" http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" rel=3D"s=
ponsored" style=3D"color:#9900cc;font-weight:bold;" target=3D"blank">in thi=
s vital part of our body!</a><br />
<br />
See here all the evidence:<br />
<br />
<a href=3D"http://greenstreams.us/QefC_dY28kxfksgTu-6pg0TU079299l5EI1E_smUv=
8h73U75CA" http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" rel=3D"sponsored" style=3D"color:r=
ed;font-weight:bold;" target=3D"blank">Where the cold sore virus really hid=
es.</a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href=3D"http://greenstreams.us/0lsQjUMrHDv87HeVzgh1e2VCOvpAC-Ja_qr-56ZM7=
3OhUsNCdA" http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" rel=3D"sponsored" target=3D"blank"=
><img http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" src=3D"http://greenstreams.us/2aca82314=
260d9cb18.png" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;
<div style=3D"color:#FFFFFF;font-size:5px;">ame clear watching Tamasha that=
 Imtiaz may be running out of ideas. There are just so many times you can r=
omanticize self-healing and coming-of-age before it all starts to feel cont=
rived. In the case of this film, frankly Harry and Sejal come off as charac=
ters in search of a plot.&quot;=
=
 Anupama Chopra of Film Companion wrote &quot;The problem is that Imtiaz is=
 unable to mould the larger-than-life romantic persona of Shah Rukh into hi=
s own more bruised brand of romance. Twenty-two years later, Shah Rukh is s=
till Raj &ndash; tender, sensitive and resolutely chaste &ndash; at least w=
ith the woman he loves.&quot;=
=
 Box office The film&#39;s box office gross is ?153.43 crore (US$20 million=
), including ?894 million (US$12 million) in India and ?641 million (US$8.5=
 million) overseas.=
=
 The film under-performed at the domestic box office.=
=
 However, the film was an overseas success, grossing US$10 million overseas=
, making it the year&#39;s second highest overseas grosser, behind only Rae=
es, another Shah Rukh Khan starrer.=
=
 Domestic The film collected ?152.5 million on opening day,=
=
 becoming the lowest opener for a Shah Rukh Khan film in three years.=
=
 On the second day, it collected ? 15 crores, followed by its third day&#39=
;s collection of ? 15.50 crores, bringing its first weekend&#39;s collectio=
n to ? 45.75 crores, and making it 2017&#39;s sixth-highest first-weekend-c=
ollecting Bollywood film in the domestic market.=
=
 Nevertheless, the weekend box office collection of the film did not manage=
 to cross ? 50 crores, and it emerged as one of the lowest openers of Shah =
Rukh Khan in recent years.=
=
=
=
 Overseas On the first day, the film collected ?50.57 lakh (US$67,000) from=
 27 screens in Australia, ?2,083,000 (US$28,000) from 20 screens in New Zea=
land, ?11.0 million (US$150,000) from 104 screens in the United Kingdom, ?2=
4.4 million (US$320,000) from 252 screens in the United States and ?5,826,0=
00 (US$77,000) from 26 screens in Canada.=
=
 On the second day, the film collected ?1,896,000 (US$25,000) from 10 scree=
ns in Australia, ?1,601,000 (US$21,000) from 16 screens in New Zealand, ?11=
.7 million (US$160,000) from 105 screens in the UK, ?25.3 million (US$340,=
000) from 251 screens in the US and ?7,175,000 (US$95,000) from 26 screens =
in Canada.=
=
 On the first Sunday, it collected ?3,330,000 (US$44,000) from 31 screens i=
n Australia, ?1,201,000 (US$16,000) from 21 screens in New Zealand, ?7,969,=
000 (US$110,000) from 106 screens in the UK, ?15.7 million (US$210,000) fro=
m 249 screens in the US and ?4,717,000 (US$63,000) from 26 screens in Canad=
a.=
=
 On the fourth day of release, the film collected ?729,000 (US$9,700) from =
23 screens in Australia and ?378,000 (US$5,000) from 18 screens in New Zeal=
a</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href=3D"http://greenstreams.us/r5qGpbPDtXsYGlkDBNrkpAFmqTVer1A4eT3oLlWzP=
oV0E9RTHg" http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" rel=3D"sponsored" target=3D"blank"=
><img http:=3D"" microsoft.com=3D"" src=3D"http://greenstreams.us/10aae2f93=
c0f8bd6c9.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</center>
</body>
</html>
=0D
--6a9c7aae0bd6dbbd269910346f435ecb_1274b_2bbfa--