HOME

Mini Shell 1.0
DIR:/home/dna1981/mail/cur/
Current File : /home/dna1981/mail/cur/1585494645.M54278P20224.dna.dna-1981.com,S=13773,W=13918:2,
Envelope-to: sales@thelogomasters.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:10:45 -0600
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=miraclelife.guru;
 b=GIWRtzRXCF2/zmM9W22BYWflNF5R2jqLwfqYfpNwvnQxtwOnj73eh7qQoqVU7Irhlbbo2csF8rgI
   Fa0mWdd9ySAKAdAmdgagI8pHqlA/OIiasiB0XGQiVVFCcfP/M7d+O8Kqz/1wf0ApAzFXM3L9/P85
   vrLjVxChfxBJIkjdbBM=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4bf99509e4e94a7334660ebf1dd74f86_5197_476e"
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:07:53 -0400
From: "Blessings on Demand" <BlessingsonDemand@miraclelife.guru>
Reply-To: "Blessings on Demand" <Here’sTheGoodNews@miraclelife.guru>
To: <sales@thelogomasters.com>
Message-ID: <afmxt5kw2gzt8ko8-bs3ol6rmytdbgugl-5197-476e@miraclelife.guru>
 
 Content preview:  Message From Archangel Michael http://miraclelife.guru/w0e7cA4jAsECaQ7FcZtGgVqr5JDIWZehQDr5lOIXHd7hEGoJ
    http://miraclelife.guru/NkQSVwrTWI4jcNLW06CnyNvIZevt4DuoRy9QFA3bRX3DPVjg 
 
 Content analysis details:   (18.3 points, 4.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: miraclelife.guru]
  4.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM         Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL
                             blocklist
                             [URIs: miraclelife.guru]
  2.5 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3      RBL: Low reputation (-3)
                             [104.206.117.47 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
  2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                             [104.206.117.47 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
  1.0 BAYES_999              BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
  5.0 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.0 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII
                              but isn't
  0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
                             identical to background
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
  0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
  1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
                             [cf: 100]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL      Mailspike blacklisted
  0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG           Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:    Message From Archangel Michael

--4bf99509e4e94a7334660ebf1dd74f86_5197_476e
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Message From Archangel Michael

http://miraclelife.guru/w0e7cA4jAsECaQ7FcZtGgVqr5JDIWZehQDr5lOIXHd7hEGoJ

http://miraclelife.guru/NkQSVwrTWI4jcNLW06CnyNvIZevt4DuoRy9QFA3bRX3DPVjg

enhanced analog signal, but be able to provide a genuine HDTV signal with at least twice the resolution of existing television images.(7) Then, to ensure that viewers who did not wish to buy a new digital television set could continue to receive conventional television broadcasts, it dictated that the new ATV standard must be capable of being "simulcast" on different channels.(8)The new ATV standard also allowed the new DTV signal to be based on entirely new design principles. Although incompatible with the existing NTSC standard, the new DTV standard would be able to incorporate many improvements.

The final standards adopted by the FCC did not require a single standard for scanning formats, aspect ratios, or lines of resolution. This compromise resulted from a dispute between the consumer electronics industry (joined by some broadcasters) and the computer industry (joined by the film industry and some public interest groups) over which of the two scanning processes—interlaced or progressive—would be best suited for the newer digital HDTV compatible display devices. Interlaced scanning, which had been specifically designed for older analogue CRT display technologies, scans even-numbered lines first, then odd-numbered ones. In fact, interlaced scanning can be looked at as the first video compression model as it was partly designed in the 1940s to double the image resolution to exceed the limitations of the television broadcast bandwidth. Another reason for its adoption was to limit the flickering on early CRT screens whose phosphor coated screens could only retain the image from the electron scanning gun for a relatively short duration. However interlaced scanning does not work as efficiently on newer display devices such as Liquid-crystal (LCD), for example, which are better suited to a more frequent progressive refresh rate.

Progressive scanning, the format that the computer industry had long adopted for computer display monitors, scans every line in sequence, from top to bottom. Progressive scanning in effect doubles the amount of data generated for every full screen displayed in comparison to interlaced scanning by painting the screen in one pass in 1/60-second, instead of two passes in 1/30-second. The computer industry argued that progressive scanning is superior because it does not "flicker" on the new standard of display devices in the manner of interlaced scanning. It also argued that progressive scanning enables easier connections with the Internet, and is more cheaply converted to interlaced formats than vice versa. The film industry also supported progressive scanning because it offered a more efficient means of converting filmed programming into digital formats. For their part, the consumer electronics industry and broadcasters argued that interlaced scanning was the only technology that could transmit the highest quality pictures then (and currently) feasible, i.e., 1,080 lines per picture and 1,920 pixels per line. Broadcasters also favored interlaced scanning because their vast archive of interlaced programming is not readily compatible with a progressive format. William F. Schreiber, who was director of the Advanced Television Research Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from 1983 until his retirement in 1990, thought that the continued advocacy of interlaced equipment originated from consumer electronics companies that were trying to get back the substantial investments they made in the interlaced technology

--4bf99509e4e94a7334660ebf1dd74f86_5197_476e
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
<head>
	<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://miraclelife.guru/wKLGs4zwAAdAbKkCV1Ofs5ZkcDa7AvUEkvXDh6TTauD5uPGy"><img src="http://miraclelife.guru/24c5f122e692342840.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.miraclelife.guru/T3ohB5vTnwOczVEIAAwUPdSUqABays43DLtVO83p6fpr_93l" width="1" /></a>
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<div style="width:500px; padding:10px;font-family:Arial;font-size:20px;"><br />
Archangel Michael is <b>God&rsquo;s favorite messenger,</b> and he has an encouraging word from heaven for you.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://miraclelife.guru/w0e7cA4jAsECaQ7FcZtGgVqr5JDIWZehQDr5lOIXHd7hEGoJ" style="color:red;">To read it, go here:</a><br />
<br />
<i>You&rsquo;re about to be incredibly blessed.</i><br />
<br />
Archangel Michael is known as the angel of deliverance. <b>He&rsquo;s here to protect you from the harms of this world.</b> And he wants to lift you out of your trouble and embrace you into his loving arms.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://miraclelife.guru/w0e7cA4jAsECaQ7FcZtGgVqr5JDIWZehQDr5lOIXHd7hEGoJ" style="color:#1700ef;"><b>Click here to experience the miracles of Archangel Michael to unfold for you:</b></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://miraclelife.guru/YpYt38xCi7jQEEoYYIKQi2N7ZFKL4DwDP6JTb5iH7VoAYp8z"><img src="http://miraclelife.guru/6b200923cef7abb1e5.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
&nbsp;
<p style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:3px;">enhanced analog signal, but be able to provide a genuine HDTV signal with at least twice the resolution of existing television images.(7) Then, to ensure that viewers who did not wish to buy a new digital television set could continue to receive conventional television broadcasts, it dictated that the new ATV standard must be capable of being &quot;simulcast&quot; on different channels.(8)The new ATV standard also allowed the new DTV signal to be based on entirely new design principles. Although incompatible with the existing NTSC standard, the new DTV standard would be able to incorporate many improvements. The final standards adopted by the FCC did not require a single standard for scanning formats, aspect ratios, or lines of resolution. This compromise resulted from a dispute between the consumer electronics industry (joined by some broadcasters) and the computer industry (joined by the film industry and some public interest groups) over which of the two scanning processes&mdash;interlaced or progressive&mdash;would be best suited for the newer digital HDTV compatible display devices. Interlaced scanning, which had been specifically designed for older analogue CRT display technologies, scans even-numbered lines first, then odd-numbered ones. In fact, interlaced scanning can be looked at as the first video compression model as it was partly designed in the 1940s to double the image resolution to exceed the limitations of the television broadcast bandwidth. Another reason for its adoption was to limit the flickering on early CRT screens whose phosphor coated screens could only retain the image from the electron scanning gun for a relatively short duration. However interlaced scanning does not work as efficiently on newer display devices such as Liquid-crystal (LCD), for example, which are better suited to a more frequent progressive refresh rate. Progressive scanning, the format that the computer industry had long adopted for computer display monitors, scans every line in sequence, from top to bottom. Progressive scanning in effect doubles the amount of data generated for every full screen displayed in comparison to interlaced scanning by painting the screen in one pass in 1/60-second, instead of two passes in 1/30-second. The computer industry argued that progressive scanning is superior because it does not &quot;flicker&quot; on the new standard of display devices in the manner of interlaced scanning. It also argued that progressive scanning enables easier connections with the Internet, and is more cheaply converted to interlaced formats than vice versa. The film industry also supported progressive scanning because it offered a more efficient means of converting filmed programming into digital formats. For their part, the consumer electronics industry and broadcasters argued that interlaced scanning was the only technology that could transmit the highest quality pictures then (and currently) feasible, i.e., 1,080 lines per picture and 1,920 pixels per line. Broadcasters also favored interlaced scanning because their vast archive of interlaced programming is not readily compatible with a progressive format. William F. Schreiber, who was director of the Advanced Television Research Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from 1983 until his retirement in 1990, thought that the continued advocacy of interlaced equipment originated from consumer electronics companies that were trying to get back the substantial investments they made in the interlaced technology</p>
</body>
</html>

--4bf99509e4e94a7334660ebf1dd74f86_5197_476e--